Sound Research WIKINDX

List Resources

Displaying 1 - 4  of 4 (Bibliography: WIKINDX Master Bibliography)
Parameters
Order by

Ascending
Descending
Use all checked: 
Use all displayed: 
Use all in list: 
Bregman, A. S. (1993). Auditory scene analysis: Hearing in complex environments. In S. McAdams & E. Bigand (Eds), Thinking in Sound: The Cognitive Psychology of Human Audition (pp. 10–36). Oxford: Clarendon Press.   
Last edited by: Mark Grimshaw-Aagaard 28/09/2005, 10:43
Suggests that humans do "not give absolute priority to the spatial cue" p.26 when separating sound in the audio scene because of the ability of sound to bend around corners, be attenuated by objects or to be reflected off objects. None of these affect the sound's fundamental frequency or add frequencies to the sound so it is reasonable to assume that frequency (as detected by the filtering effect of the pinnae) is a more reliable method of localisation.
Breinbjerg, M. (2005). The aesthetic experience of sound: Staging of auditory spaces in 3D computer games. Retrieved January 24, 2006, from http://www.aestheticsofplay.org/breinbjerg.php   
Added by: Mark Grimshaw-Aagaard 28/08/2006, 13:30
States that localization of sound is achieved through time delays between sound arriving at the ears combined with some filtering of sound by the head.
Ekman, I., & Kajastila, R. 2009, February 11–13, Localisation cues affect emotional judgements: Results from a user study on scary sound. Unpublished paper presented at AES 35th International Conference, London.   
Added by: Mark Grimshaw-Aagaard 02/02/2009, 10:39
Results showed that:
1. front point sounds were less scary than back point sounds.
2. front point sounds are less scary than back spread sounds.
3. Following on from 2., increasing the spread of front sounds and decreasing the spread of back sounds lessened the difference in scariness.
Wenzel, E. M. (1992). Localization in virtual acoustic displays. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(1), 80–107.   
Last edited by: Mark Grimshaw-Aagaard 28/02/2018, 09:15
A survey of the current (1992) state of localization research in acoustics.

Critique of the duplex theory (IID and ITD) and mention of the filtering effect of the pinna in both azimuth and elevation detection when combined with duplex theory.

In-head localisation (IHL) over headphones; listeners fail to externalise sound. Externalisation may be aided by the addition of environmental cues while familiarity with the sound (its frequency specturm) may also help.

Discussion on distance perception -- humans are poor at it.
WIKINDX 6.9.0 | Total resources: 1303 | Username: -- | Bibliography: WIKINDX Master Bibliography | Style: American Psychological Association (APA)