Sound Research WIKINDX

List Resources

Displaying 1 - 9  of 9
Parameters
Order by

Ascending
Descending
 
Display options Hint
Use all checked: 
Use all displayed: 
Use all in list: 
Barfield, W., & Weghorst, S. 1993, August 8–13. The sense of presence within virtual environments: A conceptual framework. Paper presented at Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Amsterdam.    
Added by: Mark Grimshaw-Aagaard   Last edited by: Mark Grimshaw-Aagaard 11/09/2018, 17:22
"Virtual presence is generally conceived of as a hypothetical subjective state of awareness and involvement in a non-present environment."  
Proposes a number of factors influencing presence in VEs (virtual presence):
  • display fidelity
  • environmental stability
  • sensory bandwidth (phenomenal richness)
  • interactive fidelity
  • person variables
  • task variables
  • context variables

 

 
Proposes a number of psychphysiological means to assess presence.  
Attempting to assess presence: "we might expect a performance decrement on concurrent tasks defined solely in the natural environment. And when natural and virtual frames of reference call for conflicting responses, the direction of resolution of the conflict may also serve as an indicator of the degree of presence within each. Furthermore, as the sense of presence increases, the attentional resoures allocated to the objects or tasks performed in the virtual environment should increase. Therefore, we postulate that as the sense of presence increases, the virtual environment participant will pay less attention to sensory input external to the virtual environment."
Corvellec, H., & Paulsson, A. (2023). Resource shifting: Resourcification and de-resourcification for degrowth. Ecological Economics, 205.    
Added by: Mark Grimshaw-Aagaard   Last edited by: Mark Grimshaw-Aagaard 30/09/2023, 08:55

"Drawing from the recent resourcification manifesto (Hultman et al., 2021), we propose that many of the calls for socioecological transformations are, in fact, a plea for resource shifting. Resource shifting denotes the ending of unsustainable resourcification practices while at the same time promoting sustainable practices."

Reference: (Hultman et al. 2021).

 
De-resourceification is "the unbecoming of resources"
Flanagan, E., Malmqvist, E., Oudin, A., Persson, K. S., Ohlsson, J. A., & Mattisson, K. (2023). Health impact assessment of road traffic noise exposure based on different densification scenarios in Malmö, Sweden. Environment International, 174, 107867.   
Added by: Mark Grimshaw-Aagaard   Last edited by: Mark Grimshaw-Aagaard 07/01/2024, 09:10
Hassanien, R. H. E., Hou, T.-Z., Li, Y.-F., & Li, B.-M. (2014). Advances in effects of sound waves on plants. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 13(2), 335–348.   
Added by: Mark Grimshaw-Aagaard   Last edited by: Mark Grimshaw-Aagaard 03/01/2021, 13:33
Hultman, J., Corvellec, H., Jerneck, A., Arvidsson, S., Ekroos, J., & Gustafsson, C., et al. (2021). A resourcification manifesto: Understanding the social process of resources becoming resources. Research Policy, 50(9), 1–7.    
Added by: Mark Grimshaw-Aagaard   Last edited by: Mark Grimshaw-Aagaard 09/03/2023, 16:59
"We define resourcification as the social processes involved in turning something into a resource. This definition shifts the focus away from essentialist queries about the amount or features of resources to the study of their becoming resources. Correspondingly, we define deresourcification as the processes through which something is no longer considered a resource."  
"Our goal is the creation of a critical, interdisciplinary platform to identify, describe, and explain interactions among humans, other living organisms, and the environment."  
"It follows, therefore, that although the use of resources is a condition for all life, our agenda is concerned with anthropogenic resourcification under the increasingly perilous conditions of the Anthropocene."  
"Anthropogenic resourcification is founded on extractivism: the exploitation of soil nutrients, minerals, and other extractable things. Extractivism is based on the anthropocentric assumption that natural and human-made environments, materials, processes, and beings – including humans – are a cheap and ready-to-resourcify stock of inputs waiting to be dominated and exploited. Extractivism applies to what is seen as both renewable and non-renewable resources."  
"Internet technology made it possible for intermediaries such as Amazon, Airbnb, and Alibaba to develop global market-making infrastructures that resourcify themselves and the suppliers and customers they connect"  
"Resourcification is conditioned upon the practical possibility of abstracting and extracting the potential resource from its current setting and moving it to a new geographical, social, and technological setting."
Jerčić, P., & Sundstedt, V. (2019). Practicing emotion-regulation through biofeedback on the decision-making performance in the context of serious games: A systematic review. Entertainment Computing, 29, 75–86.   
Added by: Mark Grimshaw-Aagaard 22/06/2021, 08:06
Leighton, T. G. (2007). What is ultrasound? Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 93(1–3), 3–83.    
Added by: Mark Grimshaw-Aagaard   Last edited by: Mark Grimshaw-Aagaard 06/04/2022, 12:16
"Foetal ultrasonic scanning is now so established in industrialised nations that it would now be difficult to find a control group for epidemiological studies."  
"The limiting feature for the use of ultrasound in air is the severe absorption which rapidly reduces the amplitude of the field, as it propagates away from the source, to levels which are too low for most processing activities, or even to provide sufficient signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) for many diagnostic applications. There is however one exception, the manifestation of which illustrates a key point which must be appreciated in the assessment of the safety of ultrasound in air.
"The human ear is an extremely sensitive sensor for acoustic waves. Intensities which are low by the standards used for ultrasonic diagnostic technology, and certainly for ultrasonic processing, are generally very much higher than the maximum intensities which the human ear can sustain at audio frequencies without damage. Therefore when ultrasound is used to generate signals to which the ear can responds [sic] (which may not necessarily be restricted to audio frequencies—see Section 6), whilst the resulting intensities may be thought of as ‘low’ from the perspective of many ultrasonic technologies, they may be ‘high’ from the perspective of the ear. This point is discussed further in Section 7."
 
"Given the paucity of information on the safe levels for human exposure to ultrasound in air (Section 6), and the lack of traceability for the measurement of such fields (see Section 2.3), this could be a safety issue."  
Leighton suggests three categories of exposure to ultrasound production, the first of which he classifies as ultrasonic noise exposure:
  1. ultrasound generated by some device as a byproduct of its operation (unintended exposure)
  2. ultrasound generated explicitly by some device and fundamental to its operation (unintended exposure e.g., ultrasonic rangefinder, automatic door openers)
  3. ultrasound generated in order to have an effect on humans and/or to change their behaviour (intended exposure).
Neuweiler, G. (1989). Foraging ecology and audition in echolocating bats. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 4(6), 160–166.   
Added by: Mark Grimshaw-Aagaard 08/11/2023, 11:09
Zheng, J., & Meister, M. (2025). The unbearable slowness of being: Why do we live at 10 bits/s? Neuron, 113.   
Added by: Mark Grimshaw-Aagaard   Last edited by: Mark Grimshaw-Aagaard 24/12/2024, 09:29
WIKINDX 6.18.0 | Total resources: 1586 | Username: -- | Bibliography: WIKINDX Master Bibliography | Style: American Psychological Association (APA) | Time Zone: Europe/Copenhagen (+01:00)