Sound Research WIKINDX

WIKINDX Resources

Grimshaw-Aagaard, M. 2024, August 25–29, The abjection of ultrasound. Paper presented at 53rd International Congress & Exposition on Noise Control Engineering. 
Added by: Mark Grimshaw-Aagaard (8/16/24, 2:29 PM)   
Resource type: Proceedings Article
Language: en: English
Peer reviewed
BibTeX citation key: GrimshawAagaard2024f
Email resource to friend
View all bibliographic details
Categories: General
Keywords: Pollution, Resourcification, Ultrasound
Creators: Grimshaw-Aagaard
Collection: 53rd International Congress & Exposition on Noise Control Engineering
Views: 26/89
Abstract
"The definitions of sound as found in the ANSI/ASA documentation (S1.1-2013) play an important role
in the abjection of ultrasound. However, the threshold of ultrasound is a matter of debate as the
enhanced abilities of some humans to sense ultrasound are now being discovered. While definitions and
standards are useful for enabling structures of knowledge, they also situate knowledge in power
structures, leaving epistemological blind spots in their wake. Particularly within policy making on noise
and health this may have palpable consequences in the future. My foci with this paper are not only to
map out how anthropocentric definitions of sound contribute to the abjection of ultrasound, but also to
address some serious consequences for the human relationship to nature. First, I discuss definitions of
sound and present examples of anthropogenic ultrasound production in the environment. Then I survey
research on the negative consequences for the environment of anthropogenic ultrasound production.
Finally, I show how the abjection of ultrasound is a consequence of our definitions of sound and the
accompanying situated knowledge. With tools like resourcification theory and the concept of waste as
scat, I then suggest ways in which anthropogenic ultrasound production can be encompassed in
environmental impact debates."