Sound Research WIKINDX |
Resource type: Journal Article BibTeX citation key: Cano2005 Email resource to friend View all bibliographic details |
Categories: General, Typologies/Taxonomies Keywords: Semantic categorization, Synchresis/Synchrony Creators: Cano, le Groux, Herrera, Koppenberger, Ricard, Wack Collection: Journal of Intelligent Systems Resources citing this (Bibliography: WIKINDX Master Bibliography) |
Views: 13/930
|
Notes |
Experimental results for a general sound annotator allowing for the selection of sound [FX] by sound [property] categorization rather than text [descriptive] selection. See also (Xu et al. 2004; Khan, McLeod, & Hovy 2004) Khan, L., McLeod, D., & Hovy, E. (2004). Retrieval effectiveness of an ontology-based model for information selection. Very Large Data Bases, 13, 71–85. Xu, M., Duan, L.-Y., Cai, J., Chia, L.-T., Xu, C., & Tian, Q. (2004). HMM-based audio keyword generation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3333, 556–574. Added by: Mark Grimshaw-Aagaard Last edited by: Mark Grimshaw-Aagaard |
Quotes |
p.100
Summarizing other research, states that "one of the main problems faced by natural sounds and sound effects classifiers is the lack of a clear taxonomy." For musical instruments "there is a parallelism between semantic and perceptual taxonomies" that does not exist for "every-day sound classification". e.g. musical instruments are sustained, not sustained, string, brass etc. However, "one can find hissing sounds in categories of "cat", "tea boilers', "snakes." Foley artists exploit this ambiguity" by the use of sounds unconnected with a visual object. Added by: Mark Grimshaw-Aagaard |