Sound Research WIKINDX
Halpern, D. Lynn., Blake, R., & Hillenbrand, J. (1986). Psychoacoustics of a chilling sound. Percept Psychophys, 39(2), 77–80.
Added by: sirfragalot (10/23/2006 10:18:46 AM) Last edited by: sirfragalot (12/09/2008 07:00:28 AM)
|Resource type: Journal Article
ID no. (ISBN etc.): 0031-5117
BibTeX citation key: Halpern1986a
View all bibliographic details
Creators: Blake, Halpern, Hillenbrand
Collection: Percept Psychophys
"We digitally synthesized versions of the sound of a sharp object scraping across a slate surface (which mimics the sound of fingernails scraping across a blackboard) to determine whether spec¬tral content or amplitude contour contributed to its obnoxious quality. Using magnitude estima¬tion, listeners rated each synthesized sound's unpleasantness. Contrary to intuition, removal of low, but not of high, frequencies lessened the sound's unpleasantness. Manipulations of the sig¬nal amplitude had no significant impact on listeners' unpleasantness estimates. Evidently, low-frequency spectral factors contribute primarily to the discomfort associated with this sound."
Added by: sirfragalot
ig Nobel acoustics prize winner in 2006.
Looking at the sound of fingernails scraping on a blackboard (or close version) and a range of other sounds from 'pleasant' to 'unpleasant', the authors conclude that it is low-to-middle frequencies that contribute to the unpleasantness rather than the assumed high frequencies. No answer as to why this should be the case although the authors speculate that the blackboard sound, being similar to the spectogram of a macaque monkey, may trigger a vestigial warning response.
Neither loudness nor changing amplitude contour contribute to the perceived unpleasantness of the sound.
Added by: sirfragalot Last edited by: sirfragalot
PHP execution time: 0.09427 s
SQL execution time: 0.04335 s
TPL rendering time: 0.00365 s
Total elapsed time: 0.14127 s
Peak memory usage: 9.5597 MB
Memory at close: 9.4002 MB
Database queries: 59