Sound Research WIKINDX

WIKINDX Resources

Peep. (n.d.). Retrieved May 12, 2003, from http://peep.sourceforge ... docs/peep-proposal.html 
Added by: sirfragalot (05/12/2005 05:50:57 PM)   Last edited by: sirfragalot (05/11/2013 01:44:01 PM)
Resource type: Web Article
BibTeX citation key: anon2003
View all bibliographic details
Categories: General
Keywords: Network auralizer, Sonification
Views: 6/671
Notes
See also (Gilfix & Couch 2000)

Gilfix, M., & Couch, A. 2000, December 3—8 Peep (the network auralizer): Monitoring your network with sound. Paper presented at 2000 LISA XIV.
Added by: sirfragalot  Last edited by: sirfragalot
Quotes
   Claims that sound differs from light in that there is "no truly quantitative attribute."

There's a contradiction later: "Pitch and aural location can be used to indicate the source of the data, while loudness indicates the severity of the condition."

Timbre equates to "what is going on?"   Added by: sirfragalot
Paraphrases
   A network auralizer is proposed to replace the requirement to continually monitor VDU information for computer technicians and server administrators.

Soothing ambient noise (continuous sound such as rain, wind through trees etc.) indicates all is well and can be pushed to the background (pschoacoustically). Other natural sounds (croaking frogs, birds twittering etc.) indicate particular network events.

Loudness mapped to severity of event.
Timbre mapped to type of event.
Aural location mapped to source of event (which PC etc.)   Added by: sirfragalot
   Lists some sonic attributes:

Loudness: order, distinction, presence.
Pitch: order, distinction, presence.
Timbre: distinction, presence.   Added by: sirfragalot
WIKINDX 6.4.9 | Total resources: 1084 | Username: -- | Bibliography: WIKINDX Master Bibliography | Style: American Psychological Association (APA)


PHP execution time: 0.09603 s
SQL execution time: 0.08251 s
TPL rendering time: 0.00405 s
Total elapsed time: 0.18259 s
Peak memory usage: 9.5868 MB
Memory at close: 9.4766 MB
Database queries: 71