Sound Research WIKINDX

WIKINDX Resources

Leddington, J. In defense of sounds as properties. [Draft on Academia.com]  
Added by: Mark Grimshaw-Aagaard (03/06/2014, 20:19)   
Resource type: Unpublished Work
BibTeX citation key: Leddington
Email resource to friend
View all bibliographic details
Categories: General
Keywords: Definition of sound
Creators: Leddington
Views: 8/473
Abstract
According to Locke, sounds are neither objects nor events, but “sensible qualities” (Locke 1975: II, viii, 14). Philosophical tradition follows suit: sounds are not particulars, but properties; not bits of worldly furniture, rather features of (some) such furniture. Call this the Property View of Sounds. Recently, the Property View has fallen out of favor, and a number of arguments against it have appeared in the literature. Happily for traditionalists, these arguments fail. Or so I will argue.

This essay has five parts. In the first part, I recommend a widely-overlooked but intuitively plausible version of the Property View. In parts two through four, I show that this version is immune to the main objections recently leveled at the Property View. Still, the question remains: are sounds properties or particulars? Part five presents three points in favor of the former.


  
Notes
Author on Academia.com:

https://bucknell.academia.edu/JasonLeddington


  
WIKINDX 6.9.0 | Total resources: 1303 | Username: -- | Bibliography: WIKINDX Master Bibliography | Style: American Psychological Association (APA)