Sound Research WIKINDX

WIKINDX Resources

Patrick, E., Cosgrove, D., Slavkovie, A., Rode, J. A., Verratti, T., & Chiselko, G. 2000, April 1—6 Using a large projection screen as an alternative to head-mounted displays for virtual environments. Paper presented at Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 
Added by: sirfragalot (05/08/2016 11:33:51 AM)   
Resource type: Proceedings Article
Peer reviewed
DOI: 10.1145/332040.332479
ID no. (ISBN etc.): 1-58113-216-6
BibTeX citation key: Patrick2000
View all bibliographic details
Categories: General
Keywords: Immersion, Presence
Creators: Chiselko, Cosgrove, Patrick, Rode, Slavkovie, Verratti
Collection: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Views: 2/196
"Head-mounted displays for virtual environments facilitate an immersive experience that seems more real than an experience provided by a desk-top monitor; however, the cost of head-mounted displays can prohibit their use. An empirical study was conducted investigating differences in spatial knowledge learned for a virtual environment presented in three viewing conditions: head-mounted display, large projection screen, and desk-top monitor. Participants in each condition were asked to reproduce their cognitive map of a virtual environment, which had been developed during individual exploration of the environment along a predetermined course. Error scores were calculated, indicating the degree to which each participant's map differed from the actual layout of the virtual environment. No statistically significant difference was found between the head-mounted display and large projection screen conditions. An implication of this result is that a large projection screen may be an effective, inexpensive substitute for a head-mounted display."
WIKINDX 6.4.9 | Total resources: 1084 | Username: -- | Bibliography: WIKINDX Master Bibliography | Style: American Psychological Association (APA)

PHP execution time: 0.11040 s
SQL execution time: 0.08522 s
TPL rendering time: 0.00377 s
Total elapsed time: 0.19939 s
Peak memory usage: 9.5633 MB
Memory at close: 9.3991 MB
Database queries: 62